And it was then, lying there in the dark, clutching my own chest the way a lover would, that I realized how the love of another got made up, in a moment, in a touch, how easy it could be done, if you only let it run itself. And how difficult it could be if you had begun to examine the cracks in things and seeing one, began to see them all…
Older professional dominatrices speak of a time long gone, a time of folklore and fable, a time that may never have been, when slaves were true and servitude really meant something. To me, in its most basic form, pro-domination only reveals the falsehood of forms of devotion paid for in cash. And after all, you’re not even special in your role, for you are so rarely the first (or the last) woman to be fawned upon in a professional way. Indeed, the first email you get from a client details an account of the other Mistresses they’ve served. It’s as though you’re already reading about their failed relationships: not exactly something you would do on, say, a first date. So, from the very beginning, it’s all right there in front for you to see.
But maybe it says as much about me that I was unwilling to believe that devotion existed, really. For myself, I knew from the beginning: I was not an attractive child. I was not worshipped by anyone for my beauty or my grace. It’s not modesty that makes me say that, because I feel as though even then, I had a strong grasp on what was real and what wasn’t, regarding beauty and love: in some ways, too strong a grasp. White knuckle tight. The blistering hurt right there on the surface.
It’s inevitable that when you deal professionally in the construction of obsession and need, as a professional dominatrix does, that you start to doubt the validity of beauty and love. See, I have this one particular moment I am thinking of. It’s when I stand tall in 4+ inch platforms above a client, all decked out in feathers and lace, and he stammers to me how beautiful I look, all sort of emotion and desire behind the brightness in his eyes, that I begin to wonder: what does he want from me, for being beautiful? Will I ever be able to be beautiful, just be so in the world, or will it always be attached to the needs of another?
And then the slippage begins, the circling spiral into unsafe thoughts. What makes this any different than when I go on a date? What if I dress up to go out? No one pays me to do those things. But there is a payoff. And I wait for the payoff, as I’ve waited for a scene to end, to trot off with cash in hand. So what is my beauty, then? And what love or devotion does it produce? Does that mean that I am only useful if I can please someone else? Could I be beautiful, and no one would be pleased by it? Would that even mean anything at all?
It’s ironic that in order to have something better, something that feels more whole, one has to go back to a place that is purer, more virginal in its make up. Less wrought with uncertainty and confusion. It’s hard to explain, the climb out of a jaded hole you’ve dug yourself. You have to hear less noise in your head about other’s intentions and schemes and find those people whose intent is true and visible. Otherwise, you are likely to drown in a world of liars and cheats: a world of your own choosing. In some ways, one must abandon one’s supposedly worldly natures and approach things more directly – see the world as it is. No better, no worse. It starts within, it’s a conscious decision to invite only the noble and good from the world. This is ironic because it seems impossible to do when one is, in fact, pure or virginal; that’s too soon in the game. It can only be done after a walk through the fire.
For this, I cannot regret what I have seen, but it is no easy task to return from it. As time goes on, though, it seems it may have been the only way to go.

Is it a sin to take pleasure from the way others perceive us, if it gives them pleasure? It seems to me that this symbiosis can be healthy, so long as it is not the only mirror one holds to themselves for their growth and for their happiness. Living only as a reflection in others is to lose oneself, but enjoying the pleasure you give others merely by your presence and your willingness to fulfill their needs is reciprocal altruism. It is the ability to give unselfishly to another, while still expecting that you will be rewarded eventually. That reward may only be their happiness, or their arousal, and the way that makes you feel can be a strong motivator.
I know from personal experience that, if I give of myself as a Dom, and My pet doesn’t enjoy what I’m doing, then *I* don’t enjoy what I’m doing. However, when I am Domming and My pet is clearly so aroused she can’t think straight, that’s among the most powerful of aphrodisiacs for me.
We often live as the reflection in someone else’s eyes, but it’s not always a bad thing, is it?
I took my first few relationships with professional dominants really seriously. I was basically in love, and totally dedicated to the women I was seeing.
That situation usually ends badly, though. Most women who do sessions don’t want their clients to be in love with them. Even if they’re OK with it, the chances are pretty good that they won’t return the feelings.
My experience was that I kept diving in, and really putting my heart into it, and it kept ending badly. Eventually you become jaded.
At one point I realized that the thing I was looking for in professional sessions was an emotional connection, and that you just can’t buy that. If you’re after an emotional connection, sessioning doesn’t make much sense. So I quit.
I think that BDSM in general, and professional sessions in particular, are fairly self-contradicting. Masochism is a very difficult impulse to live with, especially emotional masochism. Clients want to be customers dictating things one minute, and submissive the next. Dommes, who have to pay their bills, don’t always have the luxury of being honest about their feelings or their reactions to the subs.
It seems almost like it’s a situation that’s inherently self-contradicting, and even a little corrupt, but that many people keep doing their best to make it as real as possible. I think that to approach it that way is fairly noble. But personally, I’m not really confident that it’s possible to pull it off. At least not for me.
In any event, I’m kind of done trying.
Alex,
For my 2ยข as a Dom (not a pro-Dom–just someone in a BDSM relationship), but don’t give up on BDSM just because you can’t get the relationship you’re looking for from a pro. There are many submissives looking for a Dom because that’s what they NEED. It’s what makes them complete. I know that I am only in the right place mentally when I’m Domming My pet, and she’s there with Me. We’ve talked extensively and she really needs the submission to feel in touch and in tune, and as I commented above, the cycle of reciprocal altruism is a powerful motivation. We get what we need in the D/s dynamic from each other, but perhaps you need to look for a partner, and not a pro.
This post really got to me. Might I submit it to the Red Umbrella Blog Carnival on “The Price of Love”?
http://purrversatility.blogspot.com/2011/01/sex-worker-bloggerwriter-i-need-you-by.html